5. Minister to be challenged as bias

Joshua Y. C. Kong & Mary Kong, P.O. Box 11923, 88821 Kota Kinabalu 013-8394513

                                By Hand                                                                                                 20th August, 2013

Ministry of Local Government,

Kota Kinabalu     Attention :  YB Datuk Edward Yong   ( We want a reply from you, thank you)

CC          Datuk Mayor, Dewan Bandaran Kota Kinabalu,

Kota Kinabalu.

CC:         Director – General, DBKK,

                Kota Kinabalu.

Dear YB Datuk ,

Re:  Conspiracy and disturbances in my area – Taman Sri Kepayan

This is now a security issue in Taman Sri Kepayan where I moved in since late July 2013 rather than just the guard dogs I brought with me.

Before we proceed, we would like to know what role you play in Kepayan when your area is Sembulan.  If you are acting as the Assistant Minister, then we would like to know your jurisdiction in this particular issue that had been played up by hidden agenda with criminal elements included.

Would it be proper that the issue which we call ‘conspiracy’ now had been done in anonymity?   We had been told that there had been many complaints about my precious guard dogs but have not seen the list of complainants residents or not in the area.  We want to educate them and all those people in authority to handle dogs properly in the land with the animal head in the map.

We would call these uncalled for disturbances as conspiracy in the following context:-

1.                   It is a security issue as petty and serious crimes had been on the rise since 1963 and Police alone had been incapable to handle this hence we need more guard dogs;

2.                   It has been considered by some as religious issues which I believe was the crux of the policy of DBKK, and again how can we do away with dogs in the land below the wind;  If noise is an issue, then what about those noises from the loudspeakers and those howling of dogs mainly due to demonic forces?  We need to review these important matters for win-win-win scenario.

3.                   It is very disturbing that dogs especially guard dogs are discouraged to be kept by limiting the numbers via licensing when this can be construed as cruelty to animals as far as the higher rights of the animals especially guard dogs before Man appeared on earth.  Instead of looking after them, we have certainly destroyed most animals in homes and in the wild by our shortsighted policies now unlikely to be reversed.

4.                   The greater conspiracy is that the Governments- Federal and State have been in favour of illegals and illegalities in the wrong footing as we have observed hence crimes have now set its strong footing in our society with widespread gangsterism to the detriment of all in once peaceful Sabah.

5.                   We would never know if we had not reared or kept guard dogs for more than 20 years after a disturbing break-in to my house in late 1980s.  From this experience, dogs do not like the illegal people.

6.                   The existence of grievous crimes syndicates with a mission of vengeance since we came back in 1980s is part and parcel of this conspiracy using the guard dogs as the target as the centre of these ‘disturbances’.

In view of the 6 items (not exhaustive), I am attaching the 1^st Memorandum to the State Government for educational purposes.

It is also timely to call on the State Government to address many more important issues with or without complaints under the Local Government and we will deal with as we proceed to eradicate the ‘conspiracy’ for peace sake.

Yours faithfully,

Joshua Kong                        Mary Kong