25. My dogs are safe

Dato’ Rakhbir Singh  has managed my case on the

dogs superbly in the second magistrate hearing.

Joshua Kong was today 9-4-14 discharged and acquitted from the charge for keeping “unlicensed” dogs in the house compound since 23-7-13 in the magistrate court on 26-3-14 at the dbkk’s office at 7^th Fl of Centre Point based on public complaints.     The mayor’s application for the destruction of my dogs was also dismissed by the same magistrate at the same sitting.

24. CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY at its worst

The DAY after the first Magistrate Court case by DBKK against my friendly dogs

1.      A DBKK vehicle came to my house at about 10am and two men came to my gate to tell me that they wanted to take photographs of my dogs.

1 Q.  Why take photographs only after I was charges?  Wasn’t proper investigation done prior to filing of documents in the Magistrate Court?  If no proper investigation done, then taking photographs can be the following:-

1Q1.  Contempt of Court and injustice

1Q2.  Invasion of privacy taking photo without Court Order – both front and back.

1Q3.  Intrusion without notice and what happened if I was not home.

1Q4.  The lorry to capture my dogs possibly for evidence could have happened as the lorry could be in the main road as it was before.  Anything could have happened if I was not home.

1Q5.  It was pre-arranged with my neighbour at house no. 26 as the son-in-law allowed the DBKK man in as per photo No. 1 at the back of that house to take photograph of my dogs at the back?   Allowing the DBKK man into the house was an aiding and abetting a serious crime in the context of CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY of SSY and YB Edward Yong in the same gang.  DBKK man could have taken my photo of the dogs if there was a Court Order to do so and enter my house alone.  This also prove that my neighbour at house 26 was wholly behind this CRIME against me and used the two proxies namely Puan Mariana and Pn Susie SOH – and not by chance any more.

Photo No. 1  DBKK came to collect evidence after I was charged, hence a mistrial

DBKK – two officers Willman B. Mihon and Weldie Majinki in the Dogs control unit came to my house about 10am on 27 March, 2014 and one of the officers took photographs of my dogs – 2 in the front portion and 2 in the back portion.  This happened after I was charged in the Magistrate Court on 26^th March 2014 for keeping “6” dogs in my house in July, 2014 based on two “complainants”  who are unknown to me but I believe my neighbour at house 26 is the main complainant using those two dubious complainants as these two complainants were not in the Court to be witnesses, and yet DBKK wanted to convict me without a proper trial.

AFFIDAVITS to support the criminal and civil cases against me by the MAYOR, KK

So the next question is why take photographs now and to prepare the complete affidavits and WHO are persons to sign the AFFIDAVITS with incorrect information as per documents already in Mayor’s documents?  Isn’t it DBKK acting on duress of the YB Edward Yong and the neighbour who is related to him?  So I am to pursue the case to the MACC already brought to its notice.  I think DBKK man only managed to take photographs of 3 dogs with one hiding behind the bushes when Court Document stated 6 dogs.  When we saw Mr Mohd Yaman recently in his office before the Court case commenced, he was telling myself and wife that we can rear as many dogs as possible.  Yet he filed the Court papers with a great discrepancy.

 Photo No. 2 -  a photo with his hands on the camera seen.

 No. 3  At the front gate before he took pictures of my two dogs.

 No. 4  at the gate preparing to take photographs of my dogs.

  No. 5  The photograph man leaving in his DBKK’s vehicle.  Without these photographs, DBKK would deny everything like in much early press reports, they would simply grab those dogs they wanted to destroyed or sold???

22. Rocket killed by poison of my neighbour.

21. Save my dogs

 rocket dead from poison.



Affidavit in opposition

Affidavit of Joshua Kong of NRIC 48XXX3-12-50XX

Mayor of Kota Kinabalu                                Applicant

Kong Yun Chee @ Joshua                           Respondent

1.     I live at House No. XXX, Lorong XXX, Taman Sri Kepayan, 88300 Kota Kinabalu together  with my wife.

2.     I have no children.

3.     I am elderly and my age is 65 and wife is 69.

4.     We do not deny that we have been rearing dogs within our house compound.

5.     On 29^th of  July, 2013, it was the first time DBKK people came over to the front gate of my house and two persons came forward to the gate.

6.     My dogs are very quiet and dogs being dogs when strangers approach the house, they did whatever other dogs would do.  My dogs naturally bark to notify me and my wife of the strangers.  The dogs being very sensitive to the environment would also bark against alien people including the Indon maid in the next house with extra extension to the partition fence doing her chores so near the partition fence and also walking so near the partition fence in addition to that the Indon maid would aggravate the tense situation by threatening my dogs with waste water thrown at them etc and the right neighbours also asked their friends and relative to come to their house walking up and down the edge of their house so near ours and also the dogs would howl at strange hours at night when they sense demonic charge in the air.  All these noises from the dogs can be accepted and tolerated as the benefits of the presence of dogs in the neighbourhood would sort of bring security alertness all the time.

7.     On that date 29^th of July, 2013, I have a total of 6 dogs.

8.     My dogs never disturb anyone or anything as alleged that any action be taken against them.

9.      Nobody was bitten or hurt.

10. No properties were damaged.

11.  No one lost their hearing or their sleep as a result of the dog barking.

12.  I keep my dogs in complete good hygiene because if the hygiene was poor, my dogs would have died.

13. It is only natural for dogs to shit and urinate just like humans.  It is part of the natural process.

14.  I would be worried instead if my dogs do not shit and urinate.

15.  I had always kept my dogs within the compound and only one occasion when the dogs managed to leave the premises only for limited few minutes due to the contractor poor workmanship of the second internal partition gate.  I called them back and they came back obediently within minutes.

16. The offer of compound is wrong and I should not have been compounded.

17. I have now licenced the dogs and working as a freelance person and no fixed source of income and do not have any pension to fall back on.  My dogs also partly depend on charity for their daily bread.

18. In the premises above, the application to destroy my dogs should be dismissed.

19. It would be cruelty to animals if the animals are shot and killed just because they bark.

20.  Why am I the only victim when there are so many households that keep so many dogs, cats and other animals like rabbit and poultry.

21. Does it mean that the wild animals apart from dogs as pets should all be killed by enforcement even the by-laws do provide for that and such by-laws were very poor in consideration for the well being of society.  Many more serious crimes committed by human beings do not face immediate destruction or capital punishment.  Recently two men were jailed for two years for causing death to Orang Utan in East Coast of Sabah.  So what would be the equitable treatment for human beings desiring the death of my dogs in the same vein of the dead Orang utan?

22. Complainants are not my neighbours as they have not responded to my circulars twice since 25^th of December, 2013 with an enclosed copy and the two complainants namely Puan Mariana and Puan Susie Soh have not responded to my text messages and no statements based on the incomplete complaint forms are available for this case to go to the Courts.

23.   One of the two complainants (both forms incomplete) by the name of Pn Susie Soh possibly linked to Soh See Yee – a criminal at large of several Police Reports - is just another closer indication of the Criminal conspiracy against me via the excuse of my dogs.  A Police Report is enclosed.

24. There are two valid Dogs Ordinance 1960 (Sabah No. 24 of 1996) and Kota Kinabalu Municipal Council (Registration and Control of Dogs) by-laws, 1963 have been observed with variances and inconsistencies.  So which one should be applied ?

25.  Despite several actions by DBKK to take my dogs by force which did not happen and DBKK could not reply to my letter of 17^th of January, 2014 over two important visits by the Minister in charge of DBKK and senior DBKK officers on 26^th of September, 2013 and 24^th of December, 2014 respectively.

26. The Application of the Mayor in the Magistrate Court with the Affidavit in Support of the Application to destroy my dogs are not in compliance of the Enactment No. 15 of 1996 in clause 5 (3) without the Seal of the Mayor attached thereon.  Also the Mayor had acted under unreasonable demands and instigation of others.

Prepared by Joshua Y. C. Kong    19/2/2014

20. Death sentence on my guard dogs

19. Handsome hard YB double

18. Why still got strangers?

Joshua Y. C. Kong & Mary Kong, P.O. Box 11923, 88821 Kota Kinabalu 013-8394513   

Datuk Mayor,                             By Hand                                                          17^th January, 2014

Dewan Bandaraya Kota Kinabalu,

Kota Kinabalu.

CC:       Director – General

            DBKK,

            Kota Kinabalu.

Dear Datuk Mayor,                

Re:  Criminal Conspiracy and Disturbances in our area & our complaints – Taman Sri Kepayan

Further to my several letters to you since we moved into this new area in late July, 2013, we are writing this for more information from you as this CRIMINAL Conspiracy is still on.

2.  We are not writing to the YB Datuk Edward Yong and we  hope you would extend a copy of this letter to him.  He did not reply to our letter together with the Memorandum on Guard Dogs in late August, 2013.

3.  The arrival of Datuk Edward at our house on 26^th of September, 2013 further confirmed Criminal Conspiracy which may be a mystery to you but not for us.  His arrival at our house had raised some eyebrows in Facebook and blogs as it had exposed his agenda.   A photograph of his presence is attached for your reference.

4.  Then the very prompt arrival on 24^th of December, 2013 of the DBKK’s staff of the division of health and animals control  (not identified to us) as shown in the second photograph further confirmed that DBKK is working for our right neighbour in the Criminal Conspiracy.  Without earlier communication with us, the arrival of four staff in a DBKK’s vehicle over the burial of our guard dog named Rocket on 21^st of December, 2013 after it was poisoned by the “right neighbour “.

5.                   We would appreciate that you would provide us with the Official Report for both visits in paragraphs 3 & 4

6.  We had already lodged complaints to DBKK for violations of the by-laws by  the neighbours and please take appropriate action.  We will provide photographs in due course.

7.                   We trust this would receive your prompt reply.

Thank you,

Yours faithfully,

Joshua Kong                        Mary  Kong

P/S:  Two strangers came to our neighbour house to the right  and allowed in by the maid to take photographs of

our back garden as invasion of our privacy at about 3pm yesterday. Mary’s request for identity was ignored.

 He also stated that City Hall under the Safe City Programme would install a total of 24 CCTVs around the city.---- dogs are better..than CCTVs.Joshua

Mayor regrets attitude of some

Published on: Friday, February 28, 2014

Email to a friend     Printer Friendly

Kota Kinabalu: Everyone must play a vital role in crime prevention, littering issues as well as in fighting vandalism, said Mayor Datuk Abidin Madingkir.
"The government has provided us lots of funds for facilities.
The people need to change their mindsets because they tend to damage and refuse to look after the facilities provided for them," he said, adding that they had also spent a lot of money on maintenance.
"For example, the cycling track at Tanjung Lipat. It has not been officiated yet but it has already been fully utilised and this shows that the project had benefited the citizens of Kota Kinabalu," he said.
However, according to Madingkir, it was reported that motorcyclists had used the tracks for racing purposes.
"The tracks are not even meant for motorcycles and our enforcement had worked very hard to stop this activity," he said, adding that when it comes to vandalism, even steel planted in concrete can be pulled out by irresponsible individuals.
He also said it is the duty of the citizen to work together and not to put the total blame on police or City Hall.
"When there are problems concerning rubbish, then the people would put the blame on the Mayor and City Hall. However, they should realise that instead, it is our duty - it is the duty of the community in the city to help with these issues," he explained.
Madingkir said this when officiating at the Cleaning of Black Spot Areas Initiative Implementation Workshop 2014 at Kota Kinabalu Study Centre, Kingfisher Park, here, Thursday.
"Therefore, today we should all make full use of the workshop to discuss issues for the locations involved which are Inanam and Luyang.
It is through this workshop that we are able to voice out our ideas, not only in Inanam and Luyang but also at the other places in Kota Kinabalu," he said.
According to Madingkir, the locations involved in the programme are Inanam town, Inanam Laut, Inanam Bus Terminal, Kolombong as well as other places nearby whereas Luyang includes places such as Damai, Foh Sang, Bornion, Lintas, Lido and others nearby.
"We hope to determine the problems and issues around these areas besides the suggestion of location for the DBKK Safe City Programme 2014, for example, the fixing of street lights, road dividers, reminder signboards as well as motorcycle parking lots with locks," he added.
He also stated that City Hall under the Safe City Programme would install a total of 24 CCTVs around the city.
Madingkir explained that Black Spot areas do not refer solely on the high index of crimes but also filthy and unmanageable areas involving unhealthy activities such as selling contraband cigarettes.
"We need to install CCTVs on these areas," he added.
Previously, he said City Hall had received RM2. 375 million from the Ministry of Home Affairs in 2013 for the Safe City Programme.
Madingkir said he hoped everyone would discuss measures to clean the mentioned Black Spot areas, which would later be realised, documented and implemented by City Hall.