Monday, September 2, 2013

8. Letter of demand against CRIMINAL conspiracy




Joshua Y. C. Kong & Mary Kong, P.O. Box 11923, 88821 Kota Kinabalu 013-8394513

Datuk Mayor,                                        By Hand                 3rd September, 2013
Dewan Bandaran Kota Kinabalu,
Kota Kinabalu.

CC:         Director – General
                DBKK,
                Kota Kinabalu.

Dear Datuk Mayor,

Re:  Criminal Conspiracy and Disturbances in my area – Taman Sri Kepayan

Further to our recent communications to you and the Assistant Minister YB Datuk Yong Oi Fah, it is obvious it is Criminal Conspiracy at a high level and confirmed by what we saw yesterday at about 10.30am in the main road just outside lorong 20, Taman Sri Kepayan.  The ‘watchman’ in a 4WD vehicle was likely the key criminal Soh See Yee (SSY) applying evil pressure on the authorities to act against us and use our Guard Dogs as an excuse and later to attack us once the dogs are out of our home when black magic fails for decades.   

2.             We are no longer surprised (not new) that top politicians are involved with criminal gangs with SSY as the known and unknown link in execution of increasing crimes hence our case is now confirmed Criminal Conspiracy.

3.             Further it is confirmed as a Criminal Conspiracy and DBKK is part of this as the notices we received from the department on dogs are unclear of the offence under the socalled ‘by-laws’ we have committed especially in our new area.  Since it is classified as Criminal Conspiracy, we need to review the activities of DBKK when the person who signed the letter dated 28th August, 2013 was someone without the name specified hence it is illegal.  So the warning of likely ‘brute force’ coming from DBKK is likely applied under this Criminal Conspiracy without further NOTICE.  The anonymity of socalled complaints further confirms Criminal Conspiracy.

4.             If our guard dogs (so important to us) are the matters of anonymous complaints and DBKK acts so ‘well’ on this, then DBKK must also do likewise on our legitimate complaints (not anonymous) as per appendix A.

5.             We are not sure on the credibility of the specific complaints not disclosed so far and DBKK acting on them against us and our guard dogs as victims.  The matters now pursued by DBKK under whatever policies or bylaws must be revamped for the good of all.  Bad policies must be removed.  Dogs and guard dogs are part and parcel of our society.
If it is about the noise, there are plenty of those undesirable stances in our midst not to mention the loudspeakers.
If it is about the number, then some people just wanted zero as they hate dogs for no good reasons as dogs are created by God before human beings.  So what is what now?  How can anyone for that matter make policies to restrict the localized friendly animals?

6.             We have already written enough.

7.             If the worst of brute force in whatever forms come from DBKK, we would hold DBKK as fully responsible in the matters of break-in, disturbances, and even personal injuries arising from this Criminal Conspiracy.    

8.             You have been warned of the consequence of criminal activities against us in the event of lesser number or none of guard dogs in our new home.  In view of Criminal Conspiracy and hanky panky thereof, we want to see Court order for any further action.

9.           Thank you for reading this letter and appropriate action anticipated as we also speak on behalf of the animals.          
Yours faithfully,


Joshua Kong                     Mary Kong

Cc:  legal counsel

No comments:

Post a Comment